Wednesday, 5 January 2011

Seaside Strategy - Birmingham City Home

If there was any ever doubt about how much tactics, and not just players, truly influence the outcome of a game, last night was a prime example. For the second time this season Birmingham manager Alex McLeish outwitted his opposite number and prevented Blackpool from playing their natural game. What is incredible is that it was all too predictable. So predictable in fact, that it is amazing that Ian Holloway didn't do things differently.

Going back to the game at St. Andrews in October, Holloway is quoted as saying the following: 

"I have to go away and look at why we lost 2-0, but well done to Alex.
He is a smashing man. He got his tactics right and did me with his shape.

"I haven't seen them play the way they did with the diamond. I thought that was very clever because all the space that we normally utilise very well we couldn't on this occasion because Alex's formation killed us a little bit.

"I knew they were a good side anyway but I've learned an awful lot from the day."

So did he learn? Evidently not. Like the away game, Blackpool lined up with a formation that was almost 4-2-4, with Gary Taylor-Fletcher playing so far forward 'Pool were overrun in midfield. Tangerine Dreaming's excellent blog on the away fixture could virtually be reproduced to explain why Blackpool failed to win the midfield battle, with the formation diagram still valid, albeit with a couple of names on the teamsheet slightly different.

Holloway may defend his team selection by pointing out a lack of other options, and in his defence he'd possibly have a point. With Elliot Grandin injured and Ludovic Sylvestre's match fitness in doubt, the only other out-and-out midfield option would have been Keith Southern. The former Everton trainee has yet to break into the side this season, initially due to injury. However, Holloway's reluctance to select him when fit could intimate a worry about Southern's ability to compete at this level - rumours of a January loan move might not be far off the mark after all.

Elsewhere, Matt Phillips finally got the starting place many had been clamouring for, this blog included. It's fair to say though, that the youngster will have been disappointed not to have replicated his scintillating form shown when coming off the bench. Let's take a look at his chalkboard:

 by Guardian Chalkboards

The clear stats show that Phillips had an off day. Almost half of his passes went astray during his 71 minutes on the pitch as he frequently gave the ball away, often leading to a quick Birmingham counter-attack. Phillips also found Liam Ridgewell to be a tricky opponent, winning only one of his seven challenges. These challenges are classified in the stats as 'take-ons', and it was evident how often Phillips appeared to be running straight into his man. At his young age it is not a concern, and he will certainly improve with experience, but this display shows that not much pressure should be placed on his shoulders, and we can't always expect him to skip past his marker with the ease he showed in the last game out at Eastlands.

A disappointing way to return to Bloomfield Road after 45 days without a home game, but it would be hard to claim the performance deserved anything more than a defeat, in spite of the improved second half showing. Aside from the aforementioned tactical issues, fatigue also seemed to play its part. 'Pool have played fewer games during the last month than all of their rivals, but three games in a week looked to have taken its toll on certain players, and it was surprising that Holloway has made so few changes in this period after the Aston Villa situation in November.

Those changes are sure to come in the FA Cup match at Southampton, with Holloway's first choice side likely to rest ahead of the home game with Liverpool next Wednesday. Whether any new signings will take to the field against a possibly Hodgson-less Liverpool remains to be seen. However, with the subs bench against Birmingham not quite as inspiring as one would like, Holloway is likely to be desperate to recruit new players as soon as possible.

1 comment:

  1. Interesting post. I'm just learning the ins and outs of the game - I can explain where a hockey team breaks down but find it a bit more difficult with a soccer team. To my eye, Charlie Adam didn't have a lot of difficulty in this game and, to be honest, I was a bit puzzled that everyone was saying that we played so poorly.

    Adam played 67 minutes in the first Birmingham game and completed 21 of 28 passes. That strikes me as an awfully low pass volume for him, which seems to be borne out by a quick stroll through the Guardian records.

    In the second Birmingham game, he completed 58 of 76 passes in 90 minutes - obviously a much higher rate of passing attempts. My recollection is that we enjoyed the bulk of the possession in the Birmingham game as well. In the home game, we attempted more passes by a wide margin - 556-391; in the road game, they attempted more 528-443.

    If I had a criticism about the first half in Birmingham II, it'd be that we were awfully loose at the back end - balls given away, guys not being picked up. I'm hard pressed to see how the midfield was being controlled by the Birmingham midfield though, unless there's something I'm not picking up or looking for (maybe an inability to put the ball into a dangerous position or something like that), which I assume is the case.